Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular diﬃculty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the

doi:10.4324/9780203945445-56

Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular diﬃculty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945445-56

Copy DOI

Publication Date: Mar 12, 2007

#Parol Evidence Rule #Merger Clause + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular diﬃculty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the

Full Text