Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular diﬃculty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the

doi:10.4324/9780203945445-56

Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular diﬃculty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945445-56

Copy DOI

Publication Date: Mar 12, 2007

#Parol Evidence Rule #Merger Clause + Show 8 more

Abstract
Full-Text
Similar Papers

Abstract

Q8-9a) With respect to the Plain Meaning Rule, the common law courts have had no particular diﬃculty in explaining its non-applicability to CISG contracts. By contrast, it is less obvious that the Parol Evidence Rule should not apply under the CISG. Can you explain, why? The following points might be of assistance (cf. again MCC-Marble (C 8–2): • Is the

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Similar Papers

Paper Title

Journal

Date

Author

View more papers

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.