Abstract
In recent years, scholars studying data-intensive healthcare have argued that data-driven technologies bind together new actors and goals as part of healthcare. By combining the expectation studies with justification theory, this article adopts a novel theoretical perspective to understand how these actors and goals are enroled in healthcare. Drawing on a case study of Apotti, a Finnish social services and healthcare information system renewal project, the article shows how new emerging health data assemblages stress the aims of producing the common good in public healthcare. The project is studied by analysing interviews of the project’s key actors and various documents produced in the project. The paper shows how, in the collective expectations, the new information system is justified by multiple understandings of the common good, which might be contradictory with each other. Along with the established goals of improving public healthcare operations, the new information system is expected to empower clients and patients, audit and manage personnel, promote national digital social and healthcare service markets, provide better data and tools for research, and promote Finnish research and business in international competition. These expectations are not all based on the settled understanding of the common good of public healthcare as promoting health; the common good is also defined in other terms such as improving research, promoting markets and business, and making Finland famous and a leading country in the digital social services and healthcare field. These goals and expectations are purposely ambiguous to be loose enough to gain attention and maintain it even when the promises are not met. The paper identifies the ambiguity and plurality of the common good as strategies of data-intensive healthcare and raises concerns of how this might shape public healthcare in the future. As the plural understandings of the common good might not support each other, the paper calls for further assessments of how this will affect public healthcare’s core objectives and for seeking solutions that carefully balance the goals of the current and evolving multi-stakeholder environment of data-intensive healthcare.
Highlights
From electronic health records to wearable self-care devices, healthcare operations are mediated through digital technologies that produce vast amounts of digital data that can be used for multiple purposes both inside and outside healthcare
The expectations of the data assemblage are justified in the terms of different common worlds. All these goals are not aligned with the established core objectives of public healthcare based on the civic and vitalist worlds, the attempts to guarantee the best possible health for individuals and sustainable society
The role of the civic and vitalist understanding of the common good is partly unclear in data-intensive healthcare; it seems to be at least partly taken for granted in the context of other goals that are not primarily associated with these core objectives
Summary
From electronic health records to wearable self-care devices, healthcare operations are mediated through digital technologies that produce vast amounts of digital data that can be used for multiple purposes both inside and outside healthcare. This has required public healthcare to face the opportunities and challenges of the datafication of health, the process of turning qualitative aspects of life into quantitative data that enables online tracking and predictive analysis (MayerSchönberger and Cukier, 2013; Ruckenstein and Schüll, 2017; van Dijck, 2014). Research has found the development of these kinds of broader health data infrastructures problematic because it calls for the governance of distributing sensitive health data to new sources (Garrety et al, 2014; Greenhalgh et al, 2011)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
