Abstract

BackgroundEngaging socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in health research is vital to understanding and, ultimately, eliminating health-related disparities. Digital communication channels are increasingly used to recruit study participants, and recent trends indicate a growing need to partner with the social service sector to improve population health. However, few studies have recruited participants from social service settings using multiple digital channels.ObjectiveThis study aimed to recruit and survey 3791 adult clients of a social service organization via telephone and digital channels. This paper aimed to describe recruitment outcomes across five channels and compare participant characteristics by recruitment channel type.MethodsThe Cancer Communication Channels in Context Study recruited and surveyed adult clients of 2-1-1, a social service–focused information and referral system, using five channels: telephone, website, text message, web-based live chat, and email. Participants completed surveys administered either by phone (if recruited by phone) or on the web (if recruited from digital channels, ie, website, text message, Web-based live chat, or email). Measures for the current analysis included demographic and health characteristics.ResultsA total of 3293 participants were recruited, with 1907 recruited by phone and 1386 recruited from digital channels. Those recruited by phone had a moderate study eligibility rate (42.23%) and the highest survey completion rate (91.24%) of all channels. Individuals recruited by text message had a high study eligibility rate (94.14%) yet the lowest survey completion rate (74.0%) of all channels. Sample accrual goals were achieved for phone, text message, and website recruitment. Multivariable analyses found differences in participant characteristics by recruitment channel type. Compared with participants recruited by phone, those recruited from digital channels were younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.96-0.97) and more likely to be female (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.23-1.88), married (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89), and other than non-Hispanic black (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.22-1.79). Those recruited via phone also were more likely to have more than a high school education (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.67-2.82), have a household income ≥US $25,000 a year (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.56-2.61), and have children living in the home (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.51). Additionally, participants recruited from digital channels were less likely than those recruited by phone to have public health insurance (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.90) and more likely to report better overall health (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.27-1.83 for good-to-excellent health).ConclusionsFindings indicate the feasibility and utility of recruiting socioeconomically disadvantaged adults from the social service sector using multiple communication channels, including digital channels. As social service–based health research evolves, strategic recruitment using a combination of traditional and digital channels may be warranted to avoid underrepresentation of highly medically vulnerable individuals, which could exacerbate disparities in health.

Highlights

  • Disadvantaged populations bear a disproportionate burden of disease for both infectious and chronic conditions [1,2,3,4], yet they remain underrepresented in health research [5,6]

  • Sample accrual goals for the telephone and text message channels were reached in June 2016, and the accrual goal for https://www.jmir.org/2020/4/e16680

  • Channel efficiency was 21.08% (1907/9047) for phone, 15.67% (371/2367) for web-based live chat, 15.08% (494/3276) for text message, 6.0% (28/467) for email, and 0.58% (493/85,234) for the website. These findings indicate that, to obtain one completed survey, encounters with 5 individuals on average were required if recruiting by phone; encounters with 7 individuals were required if recruiting from web-based live chat or text message; encounters with 17 individuals were required if recruiting from email; and encounters with 173 individuals were required if recruiting from the website

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Digital Communication and DisparitiesSocioeconomically disadvantaged populations bear a disproportionate burden of disease for both infectious and chronic conditions [1,2,3,4], yet they remain underrepresented in health research [5,6]. Digital communication channels such as text message or social media are used to engage individuals in health research [8,9,10,11]. Evidence-informed strategies are needed to maximally leverage digital technologies for health disparities reduction [13]. Digital communication technologies such as smartphones are increasingly accessible across sociodemographic groups [14,15,16], including homeless adults [17]. Digital communication channels are increasingly used to recruit study participants, and recent trends indicate a growing need to partner with the social service sector to improve population health. Few studies have recruited participants from social service settings using multiple digital channels

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call