Abstract

One characteristic feature of visual working memory (WM) is its limited capacity, and selective attention has been implicated as limiting factor. A possible reason why attention constrains the number of items that can be encoded into WM is that the two processes share limited neural resources. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have indeed demonstrated commonalities between the neural substrates of WM and attention. Here we investigated whether such overlapping activations reflect interacting neural mechanisms that could result in capacity limitations. To independently manipulate the demands on attention and WM encoding within one single task, we combined visual search and delayed discrimination of spatial locations. Participants were presented with a search array and performed easy or difficult visual search in order to encode one, three or five positions of target items into WM. Our fMRI data revealed colocalised activation for attention-demanding visual search and WM encoding in distributed posterior and frontal regions. However, further analysis yielded two patterns of results. Activity in prefrontal regions increased additively with increased demands on WM and attention, indicating regional overlap without functional interaction. Conversely, the WM load-dependent activation in visual, parietal and premotor regions was severely reduced during high attentional demand. We interpret this interaction as indicating the sites of shared capacity-limited neural resources. Our findings point to differential contributions of prefrontal and posterior regions to the common neural mechanisms that support spatial WM encoding and attention, providing new imaging evidence for attention-based models of WM encoding.

Highlights

  • Visual working memory (WM), the ability to retain information for short periods of time making it available for manipulation, is essential in the active guidance of behaviour (Baddeley, 1986)

  • Attention-based models of WM hold that this limited capacity is due to common capacitylimited resources shared with selective attention (Cowan, 2001; Rensink, 2002; Wheeler & Treisman, 2002)

  • We used Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to identify the common capacity-limited neural resources shared by spatial WM encoding and spatial attention

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual working memory (WM), the ability to retain information for short periods of time making it available for manipulation, is essential in the active guidance of behaviour (Baddeley, 1986). Attention-based models of WM regard selective attention as the capacity-limited process that constrains the capacity of visual WM (Cowan, 2001; Rensink, 2002; Wheeler & Treisman, 2002). There is evidence that, under certain perceptual conditions, activity in the IPS has a capacity limit similar to that of visual object-based WM (Mitchell & Cusack, 2008). Taken together, these findings raise the possibility that activity in PPC seen in WM tasks reflects attention-related processes, supporting an attention-based model of visual WM. At the behavioural level there is strong evidence for interference between spatial attention and spatial WM (Smyth & Scholey, 1994; Awh & Jonides, 2001; Oh & Kim, 2004; Woodman & Luck, 2004)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.