Abstract
The commenters argue that in the above-titled paper by M.S. Cheema and P.K. Lala (ibid., vol.27, no.8, p.1203-6, Aug. 1992) a reference has been wrongly interpreted by the authors, resulting in an incorrect impression of the defect densities. Another problem, concerning the propagation of faults to the final outputs, is also discussed. Furthermore, the commenter points out that the dynamic behavior of the method is not addressed in the original paper and that the design technique presented in the paper requires a high area overhead with which not all possible defects will be detected.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
