Comments on energy conservation treatments for MS-related fatigue and a new proposal

Abstract

Psychological treatments of MS-related fatigue mostly depend on energy conservation programs. We argue that the evidence for energy conservation training is weak – in contrast to some reviews on this topic. The reasons for our concerns are the use of informed passive control groups allowing negative placebo effects, the lack of predefined primary outcome parameter, statistically rather than clinically significant effects, and the use of insensitive fatigue questionnaires. We propose to base psychological interventions not on a view of fatigue as a constant loss of mental energy but as a subjective representation (“feeling”) of an inflammatory state, which draws away attentional capacity. This conceptualization allows to develop a three-step treatment approach: Getting short-term control on fatigue, extinction to reduce fatigue-related avoidance behavior, and a systematic increase of activities by pacing. Our proposal depends on the techniques, that can interrupt ongoing feelings of fatigue and can serve as a basis for extinction. We propose that Progressive Muscle Relaxation might be such a technique. The advantage of our model is that it shares similarities with well-established treatments for phobias and chronic pain and we discuss the shared set of assumptions. Hopefully, this will help to improve the treatment of fatigue in future.