Abstract
We discuss the following two particular aspects of the paper of Gonzalez-Manteiga and Crujeiras ( 10.1007/s11749-013-0327-5 ): First, what changes if the null hypothesis is non- or semiparametric? For example, Rodriguez-Poo et al. (A practical test for misspecification in regression: functional form, separability, and distribution. Econom. Theory, 2013, under revision) considered optimal rates of adaptive nonparametric tests when the null model is semiparametric. A second, though related question is, how serious are the bandwidth and calibration problems? Sperlich (On the choice of regularization parameters in specification testing: a critical discussion. Empir. Econ., 2013, forthcoming) has shown that the unsolved bandwidth selection problems, in particular when calibrating, render nonparametric specification tests useless in practice. Two additional questions are only raised briefly and concern (a) the computational aspects, and (b) the problem that asymptotically, nonparametric omnibus tests might reject almost any null hypothesis as probably no parametric or semiparametric model is 100 % correct. But it is maybe a reasonable and useful approximation. To this aim we recall the idea of testing the problem of so-called ‘precise hypotheses’ as outlined in Dette (Ann. Stat. 27:1012–1040, 1999) for nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call