Abstract

In the commented judgment, the court found that if the subject of the Companys activity, according to the information contained in the National Court Register (KRS), includes solely the conduct of economic activity, then the entire immovable property, regardless of whether it is used for economic activity, is linked with economic activity and should be taxed at the highest rates. By the same token, the WSA in Bialystok did not take into account the argumentation of the applicant who, in order to avoid the highest rates of immovable property tax on the acquired building, invoked the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 24 February 2021, SK 39/19.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.