Abstract
One thread which I see running through the papers by Liscomb, Brokaw and Chu, and to a lesser extent the ones by Wiens and Dardess, is implicit answers to the question, who was in control of values? (By “control of values” I mean the determination of what is good, right, orderly, proper, prestigious or beautiful, according to the context.) Although they do not provide a comprehensive or systematic account, these papers together suggest a pattern of change occurring in the fifteenth century.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
