Abstract
AbstractLaboratory and field measurements made over the past decade have shown the presence of a strong wave‐driven mean current in submerged vegetation canopies. Luhar et al. (2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jc006345) suggested that this mean current is analogous to the streaming flow generated in wave boundary layers over bare beds, and developed a simple energy and momentum balance model to predict its magnitude. However, this model predicts that the magnitude of the mean current does not depend on canopy spatial density, which is inconsistent with the measurements made by Abdolahpour et al. (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jc012446) in recent laboratory experiments. Motivated by observations that the wave‐driven mean flow is most pronounced at the canopy interface, Abdolahpour et al. (2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jc012446) proposed an alternate explanation for its origin: It is driven by the vertical heterogeneity in orbital motion created by canopy drag. Such heterogeneity can give rise to incomplete particle orbits near the canopy interface and a Lagrangian mean current analogous to Stokes drift in the direction of wave propagation. A model guided by this physical insight and dimensional analysis is able to generate much more accurate predictions. This comment aims to reconcile these two different models for the wave‐driven mean flow in submerged canopies.
Submitted Version (
Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call