Abstract

The authors should be commended for their interesting experimental work on sandy soils presented in Belkhatir et al. (2010) [1]. They used the inter-granular void ratio, e s , to interpret the experimental results and developed some useful correlations with e s . However, the Note fails to address the further development of e s over a decade to a more generalized form of equivalent granular void ratio, e ⁎ . This comment aims at adding missing literature on e ⁎ and presents a re-interpretation of the experimental data based on e ⁎ . The advantages of using e ⁎ over e s are significant and explained in subsequent sections.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call