Abstract
In the 2016 Kaikoura earthquake, liquefaction of gravelly soils from reclaimed fills occurred in CentrePort, Wellington, New Zealand. This study presents constant volume monotonic and cyclic simple shear tests on well-graded gravel with sand collected from CentrePort. A large-scale cyclic simple shear device is utilized to evaluate the monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic responses of the sandy gravel soils. Specimens prepared at various relative densities were subjected to a vertical effective stress of 100 kPa and then monotonically and cyclically sheared. After the cyclic loading, the postcyclic response was evaluated, including volumetric compression or monotonic shear with or without dissipation of excess pore water pressure. Shear wave velocity was measured before and after the cyclic loading. The results show that the well-graded sandy gravel has a high potential for liquefaction, with higher relative density specimens having higher liquefaction resistance. Postcyclic volumetric strain is primarily correlated with density and maximum shear strain during cyclic loading. Postcyclic reconsolidation causes densification of the liquefied specimens, resulting in higher monotonic shear resistance, while postcyclic monotonic shear without dissipation of excess pore water pressure reveals that substantial shear strain is required to develop the shear resistance. Shear wave velocity was significantly reduced after liquefaction, but recovered to slightly higher than its precyclic shear values after reconsolidation. Compared to other gravelly and sandy soils, the well-graded sandy gravel showed a similar or slightly higher liquefaction resistance than gap-graded and uniform gravels. Moreover, the well-graded sandy gravel had a relatively lower ultimate postcyclic volumetric strain due to a small variation between its maximum and minimum void ratios. The results advance our understanding of the liquefaction resistance and subsequent postcyclic responses of the well-graded sandy gravel soils.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.