Comment on essd-2021-50

Abstract

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> Ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements from nearly 50 stations distributed over the Caribbean arc have been analysed for the period 1 January–29 February 2020 in the framework of the EUREC<span class="inline-formula">⁴</span>A (Elucidate the Couplings Between Clouds, Convection and Circulation) field campaign. The aim of this effort is to deliver high-quality integrated water vapour (IWV) estimates to investigate the moisture environment of mesoscale cloud patterns in the trade winds and their feedback on the large-scale circulation and energy budget. This paper describes the GNSS data processing procedures and assesses the quality of the GNSS IWV retrievals from four operational streams and one reprocessed research stream which is the main data set used for offline scientific applications. The uncertainties associated with each of the data sets, including the zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD)-to-IWV conversion methods and auxiliary data, are quantified and discussed. The IWV estimates from the reprocessed data set are compared to the Vaisala RS41 radiosonde measurements operated from the Barbados Cloud Observatory (BCO) and to the measurements from the operational radiosonde station at Grantley Adams International Airport (GAIA), Bridgetown, Barbados. A significant dry bias is found in the GAIA humidity observations with respect to the BCO sondes (<span class="inline-formula">−2.9</span> <span class="inline-formula">kg m^−2</span>) and the GNSS results (<span class="inline-formula">−1.2</span> <span class="inline-formula">kg m^−2</span>). A systematic bias between the BCO sondes and GNSS is also observed (1.7 <span class="inline-formula">kg m^−2</span>), where the Vaisala RS41 measurements are moister than the GNSS retrievals. The IWV estimates from a collocated microwave radiometer agree with the BCO soundings after an instrumental update on 27 January, while they exhibit a dry bias compared to the soundings and to GNSS before that date. IWV estimates from the ECMWF fifth-generation reanalysis (ERA5) are overall close to the GAIA observations, probably due to the assimilation of these observations in the reanalysis. However, during several events where strong peaks in IWV occurred, ERA5 is shown to significantly underestimate the GNSS-derived IWV peaks. Two successive peaks are observed on 22 January and 23–24 January which were associated with heavy rain and deep moist layers extending from the surface up to altitudes of 3.5 and 5 km, respectively. ERA5 significantly underestimates the moisture content in the upper part of these layers. The origins of the various moisture biases are currently being investigated. <span id="page2408"/>We classified the cloud organization for five representative GNSS stations across the Caribbean arc using visible satellite images. A statistically significant link was found between the cloud patterns and the local IWV observations from the GNSS sites as well as the larger-scale IWV patterns from the ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis. The reprocessed ZTD and IWV data sets from 49 GNSS stations used in this study are available from the French data and service centre for atmosphere (AERIS) (<a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/79">https://doi.org/10.25326/79</a>; <span class="cit" id="xref_altparen.1"><a href="#bib1.bibx6">Bock</a>, <a href="#bib1.bibx6">2020</a><a href="#bib1.bibx6">b</a></span>).