Abstract
We welcome the comment by Rodriguez-Losada and Hernandez-Pacheco (hereafter LP) and we are pleased that they have 'no objections to the conclusions' of Marinoni and Gudmundsson (2000; hereafter MG). The LP comment deals only with the Anaga massif and mostly with (1) dykes supposed to be folded by post-emplacement ductile deformation, (2) tilting of the oldest part of the Anaga succession, (3) selection of profiles, (4) the horizontal extension due to dykes, and (5) the paleostress field of Anaga. We reply briefly to these points below.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call