Abstract

We argue that the analytical energies obtained recently in Mustafa (2022) from a radial eigenvalue equation are incorrect because the truncation method used by the author forces a relationship between two model parameters. This relationship (overlooked by the author) depends on the truncation number and as a result the exact analytical energies do not correspond to a single model but are solutions to different physical models. The reason is that the radial eigenvalue equation is not exactly solvable but conditionally solvable so that one can only obtain some particular exact solutions. We also show that the exact eigenvalues obtained for a particular simpler case are also incorrect because the author overlooked that the shift of the radial coordinate leads to a change in the left boundary condition.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.