Abstract
The European spruce bark beetle is a major disturbance agent in Norway spruce forests in Europe, and with a changing climate it is predicted that damage will increase. To prevent the bark beetle population buildup, and to limit further spread during outbreaks, it is crucial to detect attacked trees early. In this study, we utilize Sentinel-2 data in combination with a risk map, created from geodata and forestry data, to detect trees predisposed to and attacked by the European spruce bark beetle. Random forest models were trained over two tiles (90 × 90 km) in southern Sweden for all dates with a sufficient number of cloud-free Sentinel-2 pixels during the period May–September in 2017 and 2018. The pixels were classified into attacked and healthy to study how detection accuracy changed with time after bark beetle swarming and to find which Sentinel-2 bands are more important for detecting bark beetle attacked trees. Random forest models were trained with (1) single-date data, (2) temporal features (1-year difference), (3) single-date and temporal features combined, and (4) Sentinel-2 data and a risk map combined. We also included a spatial variability metric. The results show that detection accuracy was high already before the trees were attacked in May 2018, indicating that the Sentinel-2 data detect predisposed trees and that the early signs of attack are low for trees at high risk of being attacked. For single-date models, the accuracy ranged from 63 to 79% and 84 to 94% for the two tiles. For temporal features, accuracy ranged from 65 to 81% and 81 to 92%. When the single-date and temporal features were combined, the accuracy ranged from 70 to 84% and 90 to 96% for the two tiles, and with the risk map included, the accuracy ranged from 83 to 91% and 92 to 97%, showing that remote sensing data and geodata can be combined to increase detection accuracy. The differences in accuracy between the two tiles indicate that local differences can influence accuracy, suggesting that geographically weighted methods should be applied. For the single-date models, the SWIR, red-edge, and blue bands were generally more important, and the SWIR bands were more important after the attack, suggesting that they are most suitable for detecting the early signs of a bark beetle attack. For the temporal features, the SWIR and blue bands were more important, and for the variability metric, the green band was generally more important.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.