Abstract

Performance testing of components and subsystems of buildings is a promising practice for increasing energy efficiency and closing gaps between intended and actual performance of buildings. A typical shortcoming of performance testing is the difficulty of linking a failing test to a faulty or underperforming component. Furthermore, a failing test can also be linked to a wrongly configured performance test. In this paper, we present Building Metadata Performance Testing (BuMPeT), a method that addresses this shortcoming by using building metadata models to extend performance testing with fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) capabilities. We present four different procedures that apply BuMPeT to different data sources and components. We have applied the proposed method to a case study building, located in Denmark, to test its capacity and benefits. Additionally, we use two real case scenarios to showcase examples of failing performance tests in the building, as well as discovery of causes of underperformance. Finally, to examine the limits to the benefits of the applied procedure, a detailed elaboration of a hypothetical scenario is presented. Our findings demonstrate that the method has potential and it can serve to increase the energy efficiency of a wide range of buildings.

Highlights

  • In 2016, the building sector accounted for over 40% of the energy consumption in both the United States (US) and European Union (EU) [1]

  • This paper proposes the usage of PTing in the aid of fault detection and diagnostics (FDD)

  • We presented the Building Metadata Performance Testing (BuMPeT) method, which uses a metadata model to extend PTing with FDD capabilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2016, the building sector accounted for over 40% of the energy consumption in both the United States (US) and European Union (EU) [1]. A number of regulations exist, with an aim towards improving the standards for electricity consumption of buildings. These regulations are often framed as certifications or building models that predict the expected energy performance of proposed buildings. To discover and potentially address underperformance, the concept of Performance testing/Performance tests (PTing/PTs) has been created, which enables a real-time assessment and analysis of the observed behavior of the building [3,4,5]. The potential discovery of faults or underperformance in the building through PTing is definitely supporting FDD processes, too [6,7,8,9]. The accurate diagnosis of faults is unattainable due to the PTs’ lack of visibility in the internal metadata of the building

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call