Abstract

Automated fault detection and diagnostics analysis in commercial building systems using machine learning (ML) can improve the building’s efficiency and conserve energy costs from inefficient equipment operation. However, ML can be challenging to implement in existing systems due to a lack of common data standards and because of a lack of building operators trained in ML techniques. Additionally, results from ML procedures can be complicated for untrained users to interpret. Boolean rule-based analysis is standard in current automated fault detection and diagnostics (AFDD) solutions but limits analysis to the rules defined and calibrated by energy engineers. Boolean rule-based analysis and ML can be combined to create an effective fault detection and diagnostics (FDD) tool. Three examples of ML’s advantages over rule-based analysis are explored by analyzing functional building equipment. ML can detect long-term faults in the system caused by a lack of system maintenance. It can also detect faults in system components with incomplete sets of sensors by modeling expected system operations and by making comparisons to actual system operations. An example of ML detecting a failure in a building is shown along with a demonstration of the soft decision boundaries of ML-based FDD compared to Boolean rule-based FDD analysis. The results from the three examples are used to demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of using ML for AFDD analysis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.