Abstract
Due to the need for controlling many ageing and complex structures, structural health monitoring (SHM) has become increasingly common over the past few decades. However, one of the main limitations for the implementation of continuous monitoring systems in real-world structures is the effect that benign influences, such as environmental and operational variations (EOVs), have on damage sensitive features. These fluctuations may mask malign changes caused by structural damages, resulting in false structural condition assessment. When damage identification is implemented as novelty detection due to the lack of known damage states, outliers may be part of the data set as the result of the benign and malign factors mentioned above. Thanks to the developments in the field of robust outlier detection, the current paper presents a new data fusion method based on the use of cointegration and minimum covariance determinant estimator (MCD), which allows us to visualize and to classify outliers in SHM data, depending on their origin. To validate the effectiveness of this technique, the recent case study of the KW51 bridge has been considered, whose natural frequencies are subjected to variations due to both EOVs and a real structural change.
Highlights
The main engineering disciplines associated with damage detection are undoubtedly structural health monitoring (SHM) and non-destructive evaluation (NDE)
Level 1 is distinguished from the others, as it can be accomplished without the knowledge of the structure behaviour when it is damaged. This is why the goal of this paper is to propose a novel approach based on the use of cointegration and robust outlier statistics aiming at improving the damage detection strategies for real-world structures
A novel approach based on the use of cointegration and robust outlier detection is described as a means of characterizing outliers in the data
Summary
The main engineering disciplines associated with damage detection are undoubtedly structural health monitoring (SHM) and non-destructive evaluation (NDE). Even though the most recent NDE techniques have proven to be very effective in case of composite laminates or pipe inspection [1], SHM procedures offer many advantages when applied to the case of real-world civil structures. SHM is based on permanent sensors, while in NDE, the devices (i.e., eddy-current probe, X-ray generator, etc.) are usually brought to the desired point of the structure. The choice of SHM philosophy allows us to install a limited amount of inexpensive sensors to obtain reliable measurements; on the other hand, the local nature of the physical effects exploited in NDE requires us to install a dense layout of transducers to reach an adequate coverage area.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have