Abstract

For $3$-dimensional convex polytopes, inscribability is a classical property that is relatively well-understood due to its relation with Delaunay subdivisions of the plane and hyperbolic geometry. In particular, inscribability can be tested in polynomial time, and for every $f$-vector of $3$-polytopes, there exists an inscribable polytope with that $f$-vector. For higher-dimensional polytopes, much less is known. Of course, for any inscribable polytope, all of its lower-dimensional faces need to be inscribable, but this condition does not appear to be very strong. We observe non-trivial new obstructions to the inscribability of polytopes that arise when imposing that a certain inscribable face be inscribed. Using this obstruction, we show that the duals of the $4$-dimensional cyclic polytopes with at least $8$ vertices---all of whose faces are inscribable---are not inscribable. This result is optimal in the following sense: We prove that the duals of the cyclic $4$-polytopes with up to $7$ vertices are, in fact, inscribable. Moreover, we interpret this obstruction combinatorially as a forbidden subposet of the face lattice of a polytope, show that $d$-dimensional cyclic polytopes with at least $d+4$ vertices are not circumscribable, and that no dual of a neighborly $4$-polytope with $8$ vertices, that is, no polytope with $f$-vector $(20,40,28,8)$, is inscribable.

Highlights

  • Introduction and backgroundThe convex hull of a finite number of points on a sphere is an inscribed polytope

  • We study the inscribability of higher dimensional polytopes and describe an obstruction to inscribability using face lattices of polytopes

  • We provide an approach to studying inscribability that makes use of higher dimensional facial incidence information, in contrast to using only the graph of the polytope

Read more

Summary

The points

This is the same as checking that the dual of a circumscribed polytope is inscribed This approach works well for the cyclic polytope C4(7) because the facet normals (at least generically) uniquely determine a quadratic hypersurface by interpolation. 7} has the property that the outer facet normal vectors embedded into RP4 via x → (1 : x) lie on a quadric defined by the quadratic form represented by M of signature (1,4), by Proposition 3.4 This means that the facets of this realization of C4(7) are tangent to the quadric hypersurface projectively dual to the quadric defined by M, which is given by the inverse of M, see, for example, [13, Chapter 1]. We will show strong circumscribability by transforming M to its rational canonical form

The following matrix
Tests the presence of X in P Makes incidence verification linear
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call