Abstract

Objectives: Up-regulation of ERBB pathways represent targetable alterations in many high grade endometrial cancers (EC); ERBB3 amplifications in particular may contribute to ineffective pathway targeting due to persistent co-activation of other ERBB binding partners, leading to tumor growth and survival. The efficacy of downstream dual-inhibition of MEK+AKT or MEK+PI3K in an ERBB3 amplified EC primary tumor was studied using a microcancer 3D ex-vivo tumor cell viability assay. Methods: Tumor was prospectively collected from a patient with stage II, FIGO grade 3, serous EC and genomic characterization was performed using multiple sequencing methods: whole exome, RNA, and MatePair analysis. Somatic mutations, structural variance, with transcriptomic profiling was used to identify potential driver pathways for subsequent pharmacologic inhibition. Primary tumor cells were grown in a three-dimensional environment and the formed microcancers were subjected to drug treatment. Cell viability was determined by the CellTiter-Glow Luminescent Assay. Data transformation and dose-response curves were generated using GraphPad PRISM using four parameter logistic regression. CompuSyn software with the Chou-Talalay method was used to analyze drug interactions and synergy. The Fractional response-Combination index (Fa-CI) plot was generated with Microsoft Excel. Capivasertib, GDC-0084, and cobimetinib were used to inhibit AKT, PI3K/mTOR, and MEK, respectively. Inhibitory effect was defined as percent reduction in ATP at clinically-defined predicted plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) values. Results: Genomic sequencing revealed overexpression of a mutated ERBB3 (c.889G>T; p.Asp297Tyr) transcript within a 6N focal amplification. Additional pertinent alterations included a MYC mid-level gain, and TP53 double hit (loss and exonic splicing silencer (ESS)). Inhibition of cell viability was moderate by single agents: capivasertib, cobimetanib, or GDC-0084, as shown by inhibitory effect values of 33.9%, 35.9% and 49.9%, respectively. Two combinations with cobimetinib demonstrated increasing inhibitory effect values of 76.2% for cobimetanib/capivasertib at the Cmax of capivasertib and 79.7% for cobimetanib/GDC-0084 at the Cmax of cobimetanib. Synergy was evidenced by a combination index <1 at all points with Fa>0.8 (Figure 1). Conclusions: Combined inhibition of MEK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathways synergistically suppress viability in a patient-derived high-grade serous EC harboring a ERBB3 amplification. Further ex-vivo testing should be performed in endometrial tumors with other ERBB3 aberrations to allow generalization of results. Up-regulation of ERBB pathways represent targetable alterations in many high grade endometrial cancers (EC); ERBB3 amplifications in particular may contribute to ineffective pathway targeting due to persistent co-activation of other ERBB binding partners, leading to tumor growth and survival. The efficacy of downstream dual-inhibition of MEK+AKT or MEK+PI3K in an ERBB3 amplified EC primary tumor was studied using a microcancer 3D ex-vivo tumor cell viability assay. Tumor was prospectively collected from a patient with stage II, FIGO grade 3, serous EC and genomic characterization was performed using multiple sequencing methods: whole exome, RNA, and MatePair analysis. Somatic mutations, structural variance, with transcriptomic profiling was used to identify potential driver pathways for subsequent pharmacologic inhibition. Primary tumor cells were grown in a three-dimensional environment and the formed microcancers were subjected to drug treatment. Cell viability was determined by the CellTiter-Glow Luminescent Assay. Data transformation and dose-response curves were generated using GraphPad PRISM using four parameter logistic regression. CompuSyn software with the Chou-Talalay method was used to analyze drug interactions and synergy. The Fractional response-Combination index (Fa-CI) plot was generated with Microsoft Excel. Capivasertib, GDC-0084, and cobimetinib were used to inhibit AKT, PI3K/mTOR, and MEK, respectively. Inhibitory effect was defined as percent reduction in ATP at clinically-defined predicted plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) values. Genomic sequencing revealed overexpression of a mutated ERBB3 (c.889G>T; p.Asp297Tyr) transcript within a 6N focal amplification. Additional pertinent alterations included a MYC mid-level gain, and TP53 double hit (loss and exonic splicing silencer (ESS)). Inhibition of cell viability was moderate by single agents: capivasertib, cobimetanib, or GDC-0084, as shown by inhibitory effect values of 33.9%, 35.9% and 49.9%, respectively. Two combinations with cobimetinib demonstrated increasing inhibitory effect values of 76.2% for cobimetanib/capivasertib at the Cmax of capivasertib and 79.7% for cobimetanib/GDC-0084 at the Cmax of cobimetanib. Synergy was evidenced by a combination index <1 at all points with Fa>0.8 (Figure 1). Combined inhibition of MEK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathways synergistically suppress viability in a patient-derived high-grade serous EC harboring a ERBB3 amplification. Further ex-vivo testing should be performed in endometrial tumors with other ERBB3 aberrations to allow generalization of results.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call