Abstract

For carbon capture and storage (CCS) applications different sets of equations of state are used to describe the whole CCS-chain. While for the transport and pipeline sections highly accurate equations of state (EOS) explicit in the Helmholtz energy are used, properties under typical geological storage conditions are described by more simple, mostly cubic EOS, and brines are described by Gibbs energy models. Combining the transport and storage sections leads to inconsistent calculations. Since the used models are formulated in different independent variables (temperature and density versus temperature and pressure), mass and energy balances are challenging and equilibria in the injection region are difficult to model. To overcome these limitations, a predictive combination of the Gibbs energy-based IAPWS seawater model (IAPWS R13-08, 2008) with Helmholtz energy-based multi-parameter EOS is presented within this work. The Helmholtz energy model used in this work is based on the EOS-CG-2016 of Gernert and Span (J Chem Thermodyn 93:274–293, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2015.05.015, 2016). The results prove that a consistent combination of the two different models is possible. Furthermore, it is shown, that a more complex brine model needs to be combined with Helmholtz energy EOS for calculations at storage conditions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call