Abstract
Specific deficits in the processing of transient visual stimuli have been identified in reading-disabled children. It has been suggested that suitably chosen colored filters can assist reading-disabled children but this is controversial. In order to assess how colored lenses might assist a reading-disabled child, we compared contrast sensitivity judgments of 20 disabled readers with those made by 20 good readers of the same age. Contrast sensitivity thresholds were measured over a spatial frequency range of 0.4 to 12.8 cpd. Contrast sensitivity functions were recorded for each child under four different conditions. For each condition the child wore a spectacle frame with a colored filter which had been selected on the basis of the child's best and worst performances on a spatial location task (BEST and WORST), a neutral density optical filter (GRAY), and an untinted filter (CLEAR). The results showed that the best colored filter selected for each of the disabled readers dramatically reduced sensitivity as the spatial frequency moved into the range of printed material (i.e., sensitivity declined sharply from 0.4 to 12.8 cpd). In contrast, there was very little change in sensitivity for the good readers using their best filters. These provocative findings suggest that colored optical filters might improve transient-on-sustained inhibition in disabled readers. It is possible that individually designed filters will provide a way of mitigating the effects of weak transient processing in reading-disabled children. However, our results should not be interpreted as supporting the efficacy of prescribed, colored optical filters as a remediation technique for reading disability.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call