Abstract

I suggest that to decolonize conservation we must also decolonize our way of seeing land and nature-society relations inscribed in it as landscapes. I proceed in three parts. First, drawing on insights from post- and decolonial studies, critical geography, environmental history and political ecology, I highlight three problems that underpin a landscape way of seeing nature-society relations: depoliticization, simplification/decomplexification, and representation. Second,to illustrate the colonial legacy of the contemporary landscape approach to nature conservation, I revisit the global history of landscapism – the double movement of colonizing landscapes/landscapingcolonies. This double movement began with the internal colonization of European landscapes (autonomous political communities), and continued through the landscaping of (settler-)colonies by Europeans outside of their homelands. Third, through the contemporary case of a landscape conservation initiative in Tanzania (the so-called "Tarangire-Manyara Ecosystem"), I illustrate the implications of the double movement in the colonial present of African conservation. I conclude with a few remarks on what decolonization of conservation would have to entail in scientific research and practice.

Highlights

  • I suggest that to decolonize conservation – the theme of the Special Section that this article is part of – we must decolonize our way of seeing land and nature-society relations inscribed in it as landscapes

  • Before I lay out my contention with landscapes, a brief review is warranted of this slippery, ambiguous, ambivalent, confusing, and yet politically powerful and analytically productive concept (Minca, 2007a; Minca, 2007b; Wylie, 2007)

  • Associated with Carl Sauer and the Berkeley School, landscapes were studied through empirical, descriptive, first-hand observations (Wylie, 2007)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

I suggest that to decolonize conservation – the theme of the Special Section that this article is part of – we must decolonize our way of seeing land and nature-society relations inscribed in it as landscapes. Conservation and environmental sciences have even embraced a new objectivist landscape turn since the 1990s, which posits that socio-ecological systems and associated environmental problems can be best understood and intervened in through the so-called landscape approach This approach has paved the way for the revival of a landscape concept as an a priori given space and container with particular ecological, biophysical and cultural properties – nature-society relations – that can be objectively determined through a positivist methodology of field-based observations, geospatial analytics, modelling and quantification (Poerting & Marquardt, 2019; Weber & Kühne, 2019). The article concludes with a few remarks on what decolonization of conservation would have to entail in research and practice

The rise of the landscape approach in nature conservation
Revisiting the global history of landscapism
Findings
Conclusion: decolonizing landscapes?
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.