Abstract
I suggest that to decolonize conservation we must also decolonize our way of seeing land and nature-society relations inscribed in it as landscapes. I proceed in three parts. First, drawing on insights from post- and decolonial studies, critical geography, environmental history and political ecology, I highlight three problems that underpin a landscape way of seeing nature-society relations: depoliticization, simplification/decomplexification, and representation. Second,to illustrate the colonial legacy of the contemporary landscape approach to nature conservation, I revisit the global history of landscapism – the double movement of colonizing landscapes/landscapingcolonies. This double movement began with the internal colonization of European landscapes (autonomous political communities), and continued through the landscaping of (settler-)colonies by Europeans outside of their homelands. Third, through the contemporary case of a landscape conservation initiative in Tanzania (the so-called "Tarangire-Manyara Ecosystem"), I illustrate the implications of the double movement in the colonial present of African conservation. I conclude with a few remarks on what decolonization of conservation would have to entail in scientific research and practice.
Highlights
I suggest that to decolonize conservation – the theme of the Special Section that this article is part of – we must decolonize our way of seeing land and nature-society relations inscribed in it as landscapes
Before I lay out my contention with landscapes, a brief review is warranted of this slippery, ambiguous, ambivalent, confusing, and yet politically powerful and analytically productive concept (Minca, 2007a; Minca, 2007b; Wylie, 2007)
Associated with Carl Sauer and the Berkeley School, landscapes were studied through empirical, descriptive, first-hand observations (Wylie, 2007)
Summary
I suggest that to decolonize conservation – the theme of the Special Section that this article is part of – we must decolonize our way of seeing land and nature-society relations inscribed in it as landscapes. Conservation and environmental sciences have even embraced a new objectivist landscape turn since the 1990s, which posits that socio-ecological systems and associated environmental problems can be best understood and intervened in through the so-called landscape approach This approach has paved the way for the revival of a landscape concept as an a priori given space and container with particular ecological, biophysical and cultural properties – nature-society relations – that can be objectively determined through a positivist methodology of field-based observations, geospatial analytics, modelling and quantification (Poerting & Marquardt, 2019; Weber & Kühne, 2019). The article concludes with a few remarks on what decolonization of conservation would have to entail in research and practice
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.