Abstract
Isodeformation contours obtained from collective model calculations, from the NpNn scheme and from a schematic F-spin invariant interacting boson model are compared with empirical systematics in the 50<or=Z<or=82, 82<or=N<or=126 shells. The comparison shows the relationships among these different approaches and their respective advantages and limitations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
