Abstract

In the last three decades of the twentieth century two different theories on identity were developed among sociologists (Identity Theory) and social psychologists (Social Identity Theory). Although they developed independently they share similarities such as the claim that between individual behavior and social structure there is a dynamic mediation of a self which is socially constructed. We will describe both theoretical models, as well as some of the social psychologists’ efforts to systematically compare them in the years thereafter, in order to create a unified theory on collective identity out of both explanatory frameworks that have occupied parallel but homonymous universes. Additionally, we will make a journey into the discourse analysis’ fields on identity, and we will explore some of its key features. Although this article is not aimed at discussing a particular hypothetical body, we would like to state that our thesis is clear: greater inter-paradigm communication and commonality of goals will lead to greater comprehension levels of broad identity phenomena.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call