Abstract

This text presents analyzes of the ideological discourse that fueled the collapse in the intentionality of selection and distribution of knowledge considered valid. Specifically, problematizing as curricular documents proposed after the reform of the curriculum in the 1990s, they presented, discursively, questions related to knowledge. It is assumed that the links established with the market, from the neoliberal perspective, caused a collapse in the fundamentals of curriculum development, directly affecting the process of construction of the curriculum and/or curriculum documents. In this context, it is relevant to present the analyzes arising from the questioning of Curricular Documents, as practice of distinct and multireferenced meanings, conceived from a process that admits a logic of deconstruction of the discourses. In conclusion, the collapse did not occur in the context of curricular development, but of its "new" constitutive foundations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call