Collaborative practices for children with medical complexities and their families: A scoping review

Abstract

Objective This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of collaborative practices for children with medical complexities and their families by life stage.Methods This scoping review was conducted based on the JBI scoping review manual using the PubMed, CINAHL, and Medical Journal databases. Search terms included "collaboration," "intersectoral collaboration," "children with medical complexity," and "children with special healthcare needs," whereas control words included "children with special healthcare needs," "children with medical care," "children with severe mental and physical disabilities," and "children with severe mental and physical disabilities." The inclusion criteria were articles in Japan that reported on practices for children (aged 0-18 years) with medical care needs and collaboration among other multiple professions, research articles, excluding review and protocol articles, and English or Japanese articles. For the analysis, collaboration-related practices were extracted from selected papers, categorized based on similarities in content, and further summarized according to the life stage. Three researchers discussed the selection of papers, data extraction, and analysis until a consensus was reached.Results The analysis included 30 papers (27 Japanese and three English papers). Regarding publication year, 14 papers were published within the last 3 years. Additionally, 19 case and 26 practice reports and 11 studies (quantitative research; one, qualitative research; 10) were published by professionals. Regarding collaborative practices, 160 cases were extracted and classified into nine. In "discharge support," practices in all subcategories were reported for preschoolers, whereas only two of the five subcategories were reported for school-aged children. Contrastingly, in the "maintenance phase in preschool, daycare, and school," preschoolers reported practices in two of the seven subcategories. Additionally, various professionals from the fields of medicine, welfare, education, and administration were involved in the collaboration.Conclusion There were differences in the reporting of collaborative practices at each life stage. Although numerous professionals were involved, reports of collaborative practices among them were unevenly distributed. Eventually, it will be necessary to investigate the nature of collaborative practices among various professionals, focusing on children and their families.