Abstract

ABSTRACTResearch on collaborative remembering suggests that collaboration hampers group memory (i.e., collaborative inhibition), yet enhances later individual memory. Studies examining collaborative effects on memory for emotional stimuli are scarce, especially concerning later individual memory. In the present study, female undergraduates watched an emotional movie and recalled it either collaboratively (n = 60) or individually (n = 60), followed by an individual free recall test and a recognition test. We replicated the standard collaborative inhibition effect. Further, in line with the literature, the collaborative condition displayed better post-collaborative individual memory. More importantly, in post-collaborative free recall, the centrality of the information to the movie plot did not play an important role. Recognition rendered slightly different results. Although collaboration rendered more correct recognition for more central details, it did not enhance recognition of background details. Secondly, the collaborative and individual conditions did not differ with respect to overlap of unique correct items in free recall. Yet, during recognition former collaborators more unanimously endorsed correct answers, as well as errors. Finally, extraversion, neuroticism, social anxiety, and depressive symptoms did not moderate the influence of collaboration on memory. Implications for the fields of forensic and clinical psychology are discussed.

Highlights

  • Remembering is a constructive process that is vulnerable to external influences, including social interactions (Conway, 2012)

  • If a collaborative group consists of three members, total unique details recalled by this small group should be compared with the total number of unique details reported by three single individuals asked to remember only by themselves

  • Group comparisons showed that the mean total correct score was significantly higher for the nominal groups, t (38) = 8.06, p < .001, d = 2.55, 95% CId [1.7, 3.38]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remembering is a constructive process that is vulnerable to external influences, including social interactions (Conway, 2012). The group output contains fewer items if it is compared to the combined recall of participants in the individual condition This phenomenon is referred to as collaborative inhibition (Weldon & Bellinger, 1997). Among several possible explanations for collaborative inhibition, the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis (Basden, Basden, Bryner, & Thomas, 1997) has received the most support (see Harris, Barnier, & Sutton, 2012; Rajaram & Pereira-Pasarin, 2010) According to this account, people’s idiosyncratic retrieval strategies are disturbed by exposure to the recall of others following different strategies. These error-correcting properties of collaborating groups even extend to stimuli that are known to enhance recognition errors (e.g., DRM lists; Takahashi, 2007, Experiments 2 & 3; Thorley & Dewhurst, 2009; but see Basden, Basden, Thomas, & Souphasith, 1998)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call