Abstract
ABSTRACT Paul de Man’s thoroughgoing critique of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s symbol, which has had a lasting impact on Romantic scholarship, is based upon the supposed incompatibility of materiality and “translucence.” This article sets out to deconstruct de Man’s argument on the basis of a specific appeal to materiality. But it also takes his critique as a virtuous provocation to clarify the relationship between materiality and the metaphysics and phenomenology of translucence. Towards this end, the article develops a material history of translucence, focusing on Coleridge’s early notebook descriptions of weather phenomena, light, and water, and his representations of light in his poem, “This Lime-Tree Bower My Prison.”
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
