Abstract

Cybersecurity stands to benefit greatly from models able to generate predictions of attacker and defender behavior. On the defender side, there is promising research suggesting that Symbolic Deep Learning (SDL) may be employed to automatically construct cognitive models of expert behavior based on small samples of expert decisions. Such models could then be employed to provide decision support for non-expert users in the form of explainable expert-based suggestions. On the attacker side, there is promising research suggesting that model-tracing with dynamic parameter fitting may be used to automatically construct models during live attack scenarios, and to predict individual attacker preferences. Predicted attacker preferences could then be exploited for mitigating risk of successful attacks. In this paper we examine how these two cognitive modeling approaches may be useful for cybersecurity professionals via two human experiments. In the first experiment participants play the role of cyber analysts performing a task based on Intrusion Detection System alert elevation. Experiment results and analysis reveal that SDL can help to reduce missed threats by 25%. In the second experiment participants play the role of attackers picking among four attack strategies. Experiment results and analysis reveal that model-tracing with dynamic parameter fitting can be used to predict (and exploit) most attackers' preferences 40−70% of the time. We conclude that studies and models of human cognition are highly valuable for advancing cybersecurity.

Highlights

  • The field of cybersecurity has as much to do with human agency as it does with computer network integrity

  • Prior work has argued that cognitive modeling techniques can be trained on expert data so as to provide such expertise as an aid for non-experts, and that CM-based Symbolic Deep Learning would be more useful in this endeavor than Machine Learning (ML)-based Deep Learning frameworks, especially in fields like cybersecurity where expert data is not highly abundant (Veksler and Buchler, 2019)

  • That cognitive modeling may be useful in predicting opponent decision preferences in repeated security games, and be more useful than normative Game Theory (GT)-based security aids, especially in fields like cybersecurity where behavior/feedback of attackers can be dynamically observed/updated (Veksler and Buchler, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The field of cybersecurity has as much to do with human agency as it does with computer network integrity. While computer network technology changes rapidly on a regular basis, human learning and decision mechanisms do not. This being the case, research focused on cognitive science may provide the needed breakthrough capabilities for long-term network security and a greater return on investment than efforts chasing the latest software vulnerabilities. Cognitive modeling in particular show a great promise for the field of cybersecurity (Veksler et al, 2018). The goal of this paper is to provide examples of how computational models of human cognition may be employed to predict human preferences and behavior in cybersecurity.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call