Abstract

Today, the cultural, community-driven and individual-specific facets of speech etiquette are discussed in terms of the functional aspects manifested in various types of communication, including corporate interaction. This article analyzes the main cognitive and discoursive characteristics of the British and American speech etiquette from the perspective of cultural, social and role stereotypes, gives a characteristic of the content structure of speech behavior in corporate communication in three main areas—information, evaluation, motivation—and identifies ways to form these values. In order to achieve this goal, the following tasks are to be solved: (1) to determine the functions of speech formulas and their influence on the speech etiquette of British and American businesspeople, and (2) to identify the most outstanding characteristics in the use of formulas of agreement or disagreement in British and American speech etiquette. The article reveals the conditionality of the choice of speech etiquette formulas in the socio-cultural aspect and argues that speech etiquette in corporate communication is characterized by specialized functions and their clear implementation, which is the key to successful communication. The authors conclude that the change of the communicative setting entails the transformation of the register, therefore, the use of other formulas of speech etiquette. Consequently, the transition from formality to individualization of formulas has appeared in the use of formulas of agreement or disagreement in speech etiquette. So, business partners choose formulas based on the appropriateness and acceptability of use in the current setting with a specific interlocutor.

Highlights

  • 1.1 The Statement of ProblemThe problem under study is concerned with the specifics of corporate speech etiquette in its comparative perspective and implies careful consideration of British and American speech formulas and their functional interpretation as part of business discourse

  • The article reveals the conditionality of the choice of speech etiquette formulas in the socio-cultural aspect and argues that speech etiquette in corporate communication is characterized by specialized functions and their clear implementation, which is the key to successful communication

  • We investigate the phenomena of agreement and disagreement in corporate discourse by the means of contextual analysis: Contextual analysis is used to study the functional specifics of linguistic phenomena and their meanings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 The Statement of ProblemThe problem under study is concerned with the specifics of corporate speech etiquette in its comparative perspective and implies careful consideration of British and American speech formulas and their functional interpretation as part of business discourse. The study aims to pinpoint the functions of English speech formulas used in the corporate environment and identify how one of their specific types—formulas of agreement and disagreement—are manifested against the background of culturally determined aspects of communication. To address these aims, the study relies on the texts published in British and American media outlets, as well as transcripts of corporate spoken and written interactions while heavily drawing on the theory of politeness proposed by Brown and Levinson (1987). Fullness and abundance of the world picture by each individual language is the result of the perception of the world by every nation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call