Abstract

Extracytoplasmic function σ factors (ECFs) belong to the most abundant signal transduction mechanisms in bacteria. Among the diverse regulators of ECF activity, class I anti-σ factors are the most important signal transducers in response to internal and external stress conditions. Despite the conserved secondary structure of the class I anti-σ factor domain (ASDI) that binds and inhibits the ECF under noninducing conditions, the binding interface between ECFs and ASDIs is surprisingly variable between the published cocrystal structures. In this work, we provide a comprehensive computational analysis of the ASDI protein family and study the different contact themes between ECFs and ASDIs. To this end, we harness the coevolution of these diverse protein families and predict covarying amino acid residues as likely candidates of an interaction interface. As a result, we find two common binding interfaces linking the first alpha-helix of the ASDI to the DNA-binding region in the σ4 domain of the ECF, and the fourth alpha-helix of the ASDI to the RNA polymerase (RNAP)-binding region of the σ2 domain. The conservation of these two binding interfaces contrasts with the apparent quaternary structure diversity of the ECF/ASDI complexes, partially explaining the high specificity between cognate ECF and ASDI pairs. Furthermore, we suggest that the dual inhibition of RNAP- and DNA-binding interfaces is likely a universal feature of other ECF anti-σ factors, preventing the formation of nonfunctional trimeric complexes between σ/anti-σ factors and RNAP or DNA.IMPORTANCE In the bacterial world, extracytoplasmic function σ factors (ECFs) are the most widespread family of alternative σ factors, mediating many cellular responses to environmental cues, such as stress. This work uses a computational approach to investigate how these σ factors interact with class I anti-σ factors-the most abundant regulators of ECF activity. By comprehensively classifying the anti-σs into phylogenetic groups and by comparing this phylogeny to the one of the cognate ECFs, the study shows how these protein families have coevolved to maintain their interaction over evolutionary time. These results shed light on the common contact residues that link ECFs and anti-σs in different phylogenetic families and set the basis for the rational design of anti-σs to specifically target certain ECFs. This will help to prevent the cross talk between heterologous ECF/anti-σ pairs, allowing their use as orthogonal regulators for the construction of genetic circuits in synthetic biology.

Highlights

  • Extracytoplasmic function ␴ factors (ECFs) belong to the most abundant signal transduction mechanisms in bacteria

  • Class I anti-␴ factors are defined by their N-terminal anti-␴ domain I (ASDI), which features a common secondary structure consisting of four alpha-helices: the first three (N-terminal) helices form a bundle that binds to the ␴4 domain of the ECF, and separated by a flexible linker, the fourth helix binds to the ␴2 domain

  • We focused on the class I anti-␴ factors (ASDIs) as the main regulators of ECF ␴ factors, in order to gain a better understanding of their general binding mechanism for ECFs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extracytoplasmic function ␴ factors (ECFs) belong to the most abundant signal transduction mechanisms in bacteria. Extracytoplasmic function ␴ factors (ECFs) are one the most abundant signal transduction mechanisms in the bacterial kingdom, often mediating the cellular response to external and internal stress conditions These minimalistic members of the ␴70 family contain only the ␴2 and ␴4 domains essential for recruiting RNA. We know 156 phylogenetic ECF groups (2, 3)—many of which feature group-specific target promoter motifs and conserved regulators of ECF activity, suggesting similar modes of signal transduction within an ECF group Among these diverse signaling mechanisms, the most common regulators of ECF activity are so-called anti-␴ factors, which, under noninducing conditions, sequester ECF into inactive complexes via their anti-␴ domain (ASD). We reasoned that protein sequences of ECF and ASDI proteins have coevolved and that ASDI protein sequences should cluster into phylogenetic groups similar to the ECF groups

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.