Abstract

Remanent coercivity spectra have been determined for four dispersions of magnetite with mean particle sizes of 0.04–0.22 μm using four different methods: (1) acquisition of isothermal remanent magnetization (IRM) in continuous fields; (2) stepwise reversal of saturation IRM by opposite-polarity continuous fields; (3) stepwise alternating-field (AF) demagnetization of saturation IRM; and (4) AF demagnetization of weak-field thermoremanent magnetization (TRM). Alternating-field methods gave narrower distributions with lower median coercivities than continuous-field (CF) methods. The two CF spectra are offset: the remanent coercive force, H R , which is the median coercivity determined by CF reversal of saturation remanence, is always less than the median coercivity, H′ R , determined from IRM acquisition. The median destructive field of saturation IRM, H˜ 1/2 , the median coercivity determined by AF demagnetization, is less than either H R or H′ R . The relation reported by Dankers [1], H′ R +H˜ 1/2 ≈ 2H R , is obeyed for these samples and for a companion suite of single-domain magnetites and maghemites. Ordinary coercive force. H C , is substantially affected by reversible magnetization and is a poor indicator of the median coercivity of remanence. H C is much smaller than H˜ 1/2 , H R or H′ R and varies in a different way with particle size.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call