Abstract

A comprehensive Code of Ethics for the members of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) is presented as the report of Task Group 109 which consolidates previous AAPM ethics policies into a unified document. The membership of the AAPM is increasingly diverse. Prior existing AAPM ethics polices were applicable specifically to medical physicists, and did not encompass other types of members such as health physicists, regulators, corporate affiliates, physicians, scientists, engineers, those in training, or other health care professionals. Prior AAPM ethics policies did not specifically address research, education, or business ethics. The Ethics Guidelines of this new Code of Ethics have four major sections: professional conduct, research ethics, education ethics, and business ethics. Some elements of each major section may be duplicated in other sections, so that readers interested in a particular aspect of the code do not need to read the entire document for all relevant information. The prior Complaint Procedure has also been incorporated into this Code of Ethics. This Code of Ethics (PP 24-A) replaces the following AAPM policies: Ethical Guidelines for Vacating a Position (PP 4-B); Ethical Guidelines for Reviewing the Work of Another Physicist (PP 5-C); Guidelines for Ethical Practice for Medical Physicists (PP 8-D); and Ethics Complaint Procedure (PP 21-A). The AAPM Board of Directors approved this Code or Ethics on July 31, 2008.

Highlights

  • The following Principles of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) are core values intended to aid all members and affiliates to act in an ethically professional manner

  • Corporate affiliates shall abide by these same ethical principles, where applicable

  • In the case of reviews not initiated by the incumbent physicist, the AAPM does not affirm or reject the process of review

Read more

Summary

Ethics Guidelines

These Guidelines are intended to assist members and affiliates to interpret and implement the Principles. The Guidelines cannot be all-inclusive, so members and affiliates should refer to the Principles for situations not addressed in the Guidelines

Honesty
Maintenance of knowledge and skills
Competence
Professional relationships
Responsibility to institution
Patient confidentiality
Research Ethics
Conflict of interest
Human participants
Research misconduct
Animal welfare
Collaborative science
Authorship
Editorship and peer review
Author or reviewer conflict of interest
Education Ethics
Teacher
Student
Seeking or changing jobs
Employment investigation
Vacating a position
Relationships with recruiters
Corporate affiliates and member relations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call