Abstract
A globally applicable code of conduct specifically dedicated to biosecurity has been developed together with guidance for its procedural implementation. This is to address the regulations governing potential dual-use of biological materials, associated information and technologies, and reduce the potential for their malicious use. Scientists researching and exchanging micro-organisms have a responsibility to prevent misuse of the inherently dangerous ones, that is, those possessing characters such as pathogenicity or toxin production. The code of conduct presented here is based on best practice principles for scientists and their institutions working with biological resources with a specific focus on micro-organisms. It aims to raise awareness of regulatory needs and to protect researchers, their facilities and stakeholders. It reflects global activities in this area in response to legislation such as that in the USA, the PATRIOT Act of 2001, Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001; the Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001 and subsequent amendments in the UK; the EU Dual-Use Regulation; and the recommendations of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), under their Biological Resource Centre (BRC) Initiative at the beginning of the millennium (OECD, 2001). Two project consortia with international partners came together with experts in the field to draw up a Code of Conduct on Biosecurity for BRCs to ensure that culture collections and microbiologists in general worked in a way that met the requirements of such legislation. A BRC is the modern day culture collection that adds value to its holdings and implements common best practice in the collection and supply of strains for research and development. This code of conduct specifically addresses the work of public service culture collections and describes the issues of importance and the controls or practices that should be in place. However, these best practices are equally applicable to all other microbiology laboratories holding, using and sharing microbial resources. The code was introduced to the Seventh Review Conference to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC), United Nations, Geneva, 2011; the delegates to the States' parties recommended that this code of conduct be broadly applied in the life sciences and disseminated amongst microbiologists, hence the publishing of it here along with practical implementation guidance. This paper considers the regulatory and working environment for microbiology, defines responsibilities and provides practical advice on the implementation of best practice in handling the organism itself, associated data and technical know-how.
Highlights
Since that time, biotechnology has had an increasing impact on the programmes of different sectors at OECD such as: agriculture; science, technology, and industry; environment; and trade
It is mainly intended for delegates to OECD meetings who are already familiar with certain aspects of OECD‘s work
The ability to effectively use these vast amounts of knowledge will depend in part on the bringing together of different strands of information and data within resources such as human biobanks and genetic research databases (HBGRDs)
Summary
The bioeconomy is the set of economic activities relating to the invention, development, production and use of biological products and processes. An example is a knock-out gene technology developed for cancer treatment, which is being used to improve yields in a variety of agricultural crops Despite these convergences the agricultural, health, and industrial biotechnologies are following different trajectories shaped by application-specific regulatory, technical, and market drivers. These technology trajectories continue into the future, major challenges remain These technologies need to be linked together into a system where information about an individual‘s genome and validated biomarkers can be translated into treatment. Policy will need to be carefully designed to promote the most environmentally and economically efficient solutions These preliminary results are based on contributions from the Steering Group, fourteen external expert reports, in-house research, and other OECD departments including the Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs‘ Health Division, the Environment Directorate, the Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry‘s Biotechnology Division, and the Directorate for Trade and Agriculture. More information will be made available in the edition
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.