Abstract

IntroductionCochlear implants have become the method of choice for the treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss in both children and adults. Its benefits are well documented in the pediatric and adult population. Also deaf children with additional needs, including autism, have been covered by this treatment. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the benefits from cochlear implantation in deafened children with autism as the only additional disability. MethodsThis study analyzes data of six children. The follow-up time was at least 43 months. The following data were analyzed: medical history, reaction to music and sound, Ling's six sounds test, onomatopoeic word test, reaction to spoken child's name, response to requests, questionnaire given to parents, sound processor fitting sessions and data. ResultsAfter cochlear implantation each child presented other communication skills. In some children, the symptoms of speech understanding were observed. No increased hyperactivity associated with daily use cochlear implant was observed. The study showed that in autistic children the perception is very important for a child's sense of security and makes contact with parents easier. ConclusionOur study showed that oral communication is not likely to be a realistic goal in children with cochlear implants and autism. The implantation results showed benefits that varied among those children. The traditional methods of evaluating the results of cochlear implantation in children with autism are usually insufficient to fully assess the functional benefits. These benefits should be assessed in a more comprehensive manner taking into account the limitations of communication resulting from the essence of autism. It is important that we share knowledge about these complex children with cochlear implants.

Highlights

  • Cochlear implants have become the method of choice for the treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss in both children and adults

  • Before the surgery all patients underwent very careful multidisciplinary evaluation to determine candidacy for cochlear implantation: severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, prelingual onset of hearing loss, no benefit from appropriately fitted hearing aids, no medical nor radiological contraindications, desire in a family to improve child’s hearing and communication with a child, good motivation running in the family

  • Oral communication is not likely to be a realistic goal in those cases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cochlear implants have become the method of choice for the treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss in both children and adults. The symptoms usually develop in early childhood, mainly in the first two-three years of life.[8,9] When it comes to autism and hearing, the data from evoked potential studies indicates that in autistic patients there is an abnormal cognitive processing of auditory information despite normal basic sensory perception.10---16. This is one of the reasons why cochlear implanted autistic children do not usually develop language skills as those with no additional disability.[1,5] The symptoms usually develop in early childhood, mainly in the first two-three years of life.[8,9] When it comes to autism and hearing, the data from evoked potential studies indicates that in autistic patients there is an abnormal cognitive processing of auditory information despite normal basic sensory perception.10---16 This is one of the reasons why cochlear implanted autistic children do not usually develop language skills as those with no additional disability.[1,5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call