Abstract

In the present scientific world, most of the authors of scientific literature are seeking effective ways to share their research findings with large peer groups. But finding a high-quality journal to publish paper is a huge challenge. Most of the journals present today are predatory and less-quality. The main aim of this study is to help the researchers in identifying the quality level of computer science journals by introducing a data mining model based on six journal quality metrics (Journal Impact Factor, SCImago Journal Rank, Eigenfactor, H-index, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, and Article Influence). Further, another objective is to identify the best metrics to measure the quality of journals out of the six attributes. A sample dataset of 200 journals was used and journals were clustered into five clusters using K-means clustering algorithm. When finding the best quality metrics, Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated. A more accurate clustering model with an accuracy of 0.9171 was developed considering only suitable attributes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call