Abstract
Clustering of the two most competitive bids in first-price auctions can be indicative of collusive behavior. However, it can also reflect non-cooperative strategies under complete information. I propose a simple procedure to distinguish between the two observationally equivalent explanations. This method requires the knowledge of winning bids and the determinants of the bid of the second most competitive bidder.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have