Abstract

The transition to low carbon energy and transport systems requires an unprecedented roll-out of new infrastructure technologies, containing significant quantities of critical raw materials. Many of these technologies are based on general purpose technologies, such as permanent magnets and electric motors, that are common across different infrastructure systems. Circular economy initiatives that aim to institute better resource management practices could exploit these technological commonalities through the reuse and remanufacturing of technology components across infrastructure systems. In this paper, we analyze the implementation of such processes in the transition to low carbon electricity generation and transport on the Isle of Wight, UK. We model two scenarios relying on different renewable energy technologies, with the reuse of Lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles for grid-attached storage. A whole-system analysis that considers both electricity and transport infrastructure demonstrates that the optimal choice of renewable technology can be dependent on opportunities for component reuse and material recycling between the different infrastructure systems. Hydrogen fuel cell based transport makes use of platinum from obsolete catalytic converters whereas lithium-ion batteries can be reused for grid-attached storage when they are no longer useful in vehicles. Trade-offs exist between the efficiency of technology reuse, which eliminates the need for new technologies for grid attached storage completely by 2033, and the higher flexibility afforded by recycling at the material level; reducing primary material demand for Lithium by 51% in 2033 compared to 30% achieved by battery reuse. This analysis demonstrates the value of a methodology that combines detailed representations of technologies and components with a systemic approach that includes multiple, interconnected infrastructure systems.

Highlights

  • Limiting climate change to the internationally agreed temperature rise of 2.0 C on preindustrial levels (United Nations, 2015) will require the almost complete decarbonization of energy and transport infrastructure over the 35 years (Mulugetta et al, 2014)

  • Low carbon infrastructure is widely recognized as being heavily reliant on critical materials that are at risk of supply disruptions

  • Circular economy interventions such as recycling and reuse of technologies are advocated as solutions that reduce the reliance on critical materials, as well as reducing primary material demand and the associated environmental impacts of their extraction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Limiting climate change to the internationally agreed temperature rise of 2.0 C on preindustrial levels (United Nations, 2015) will require the almost complete decarbonization of energy and transport infrastructure over the 35 years (Mulugetta et al, 2014). The scale and rate of this infrastructure transition is unprecedented and, given the high material intensity of infrastructure, it will have a significant impact on the material use of nations (Fishman et al, 2016). The necessity to embed lowcarbon technologies into infrastructure involves the use of a wider range of materials than has historically been the case. CCS DECC EV GPT GDP HF ICE LCA Li-ion NdFeB PV S&F ‘circular economy’ is finding increasing interest across academia (see (Ghisellini et al, 2016) for a recent review) and in policy and industry spheres. China has held the circular economy as a development goal since 2009 (Mathews and Tan, 2011a), the European Commission published a circular economy action plan in 2015 (European Commission, 2015) and industry interest is reflected in recent reports from major international consultants China has held the circular economy as a development goal since 2009 (Mathews and Tan, 2011a), the European Commission published a circular economy action plan in 2015 (European Commission, 2015) and industry interest is reflected in recent reports from major international consultants (e.g. Accenture, 2014; McKinsey & Company, 2015) and the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.