Abstract

Simple SummaryDiagnostic imaging is of paramount importance in the diagnosis of thoracic lesions. Radiology has traditionally been considered the diagnostic procedure of choice for these diseases in addition to a correct cytological and histopathologic diagnosis. In human medicine, Computed Tomography (CT) and CT-guided biopsy are used in the presence of lesions which are not adequately diagnosed with other procedures. In the present study, thoracic lesions from 52 dogs and 10 cats of different sex, breed and size underwent both CT-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNAB) and tissue-core biopsy (TCB). In this study, 59 of 62 histopathological samples were diagnostic (95.2%). Cytology was diagnostic in 43 of 62 samples (69.4%). General accuracy for FNAB and TCB were 67.7% and 95.2%, respectively. Combining the two techniques, the overall mean accuracy for diagnosis was 98.4%. CT-guided FNAB cytology can be considered a useful and reliable technique, especially for small lesions or lesions located close to vital organs and therefore dangerous to biopsy in any other way.Diagnosis of thoracic lesions on the basis of history and physical examination is often challenging. Diagnostic imaging is therefore of paramount importance in this field. Radiology has traditionally been considered the diagnostic procedure of choice for these diseases. Nevertheless, it is often not possible to differentiate inflammatory/infectious lesions from neoplastic diseases. A correct cytological and histopathologic diagnosis is therefore needed for an accurate diagnosis and subsequent prognostic and therapeutic approach. In human medicine, Computed Tomography (CT) and CT-guided biopsy are used in the presence of lesions which are not adequately diagnosed with other procedures. In the present study, thoracic lesions from 52 dogs and 10 cats of different sex, breed and size underwent both CT-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNAB) and tissue-core biopsy (TCB). Clinical examination, hematobiochemical analysis and chest radiography were performed on all animals. In this study, 59 of 62 histopathological samples were diagnostic (95.2%). Cytology was diagnostic in 43 of 62 samples (69.4%). General sensitivity, accuracy and PPV for FNAB and TCB were 67.7%, 67.7% and 100% and 96.7%, 95.2% and 98.3%, respectively. Combining the two techniques, the overall mean accuracy for diagnosis was 98.4%. Nineteen of 62 cases showed complications (30.6%). Mild pneumothorax was seen in 16 cases, whereas mild hemorrhage occurred in three cases. No major complications were encountered. CT-guided FNAB cytology can be considered a useful and reliable technique, especially for small lesions or lesions located close to vital organs and therefore dangerous to biopsy in other way.

Highlights

  • Diagnosis of thoracic lesions on the basis of history and physical examination is often challenging

  • Masses were classified as 29 carcinomas, 11 sarcomas, 11 lymphomas, 6 thymomas, 4 inflammatory/infectious and 1 mesothelioma

  • Computed Tomography (CT) allows better evaluation of the extent of the lesion than US and fluoroscopy [24], as well as in lesions surrounded by gas as opposed to in US [1,24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diagnosis of thoracic lesions on the basis of history and physical examination is often challenging. A correct cytological and histopathologic diagnosis is needed for an accurate diagnosis and subsequent prognostic and therapeutic approach [1,2,3] Other imaging modalities such as fluoroscopy, Ultrasonography (US), Computerized Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MRI) have to be considered for the possibilities that they offer to the interventional radiologist to take guided biopsy samples [1,4,5,6]. In human medicine, CT and CT-guided biopsies, both FNAB and TCB, are recommended in the presence of thoracic lesions which are not adequately visible or accessible with other procedures [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. No investigation has been reported on the usefulness of CT-guided

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.