Abstract

Combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P) is a vascular-disrupting agent (VDA) in clinical development for the treatment of ovarian and other cancers. In contrast to antiangiogenic agents, such as bevacizumab, which suppress the development of new tumor vasculature, VDAs target established tumor vasculature. These differing but complementary mechanisms of action are currently being explored in clinical trials combining CA4P and bevacizumab. Clinical experience to date has highlighted an important need to better understand the cardiovascular adverse events of CA4P, both alone and in combination with antiangiogenic agents, which can also be associated with cardiovascular adverse events.An acute but transient increase in blood pressure is often the most clinically relevant toxicity associated with CA4P. Increases in CA4P-related blood pressure typically occur 0.5 to 1 h after initiation of the 10-min infusion, peak by 2 h, and return to baseline 3 to 4 h after the infusion. Post-infusion increases in blood pressure are likely to recur in subsequent treatment cycles; however, the severity does not appear to increase with successive cycles. Other cardiovascular adverse events, such as transient, predominantly grade 1–2 tachycardia, bradycardia, QTc prolongation, and in rare cases myocardial ischemia, have also been observed with CA4P but at markedly lower frequencies than hypertension.The clinical trial experience with CA4P suggests that cardiovascular assessment of patients prior to CA4P treatment and careful management of blood pressure during CA4P treatment can largely mitigate the risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Accordingly, we have developed a blood pressure management algorithm for use in the ongoing phase II/III FOCUS study of the triple combination of CA4P with physician’s choice chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

Highlights

  • Tumor vasculature is a long-established target of anticancer therapy [1]

  • vascular-disrupting agent (VDA), including Combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P), disrupt the existing tumor vasculature within the interior of tumors, a region that is often resistant to standard therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiation, and may have particular benefit in patients with bulky disease

  • CA4P has a contrasting and complementary activity compared with Antiangiogenic agent (AA), such as bevacizumab, and the combination of these agents is supported both by a mechanistic rationale and promising clinical data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tumor vasculature is a long-established target of anticancer therapy [1]. Vascular-targeted anticancer therapies include two broad categories of agents with complementary mechanisms of action [2]: antiangiogenic agents (AAs), which prevent tumor neovascularization by inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor and other pro-angiogenic factors, and vascularGrisham et al Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice (2018) 5:1 due to the relative immaturity and instability of tumor vasculature [6].VDAs, including CA4P, demonstrate limited singleagent antitumor activity [7, 8]. This article reviews the cardiovascular safety profile of CA4P as a single-agent and in combination regimens and reports a BP management algorithm developed by an expert panel based on these data and clinical experience. A single-arm, phase II study evaluated the combination of CA4P (63 mg/m2) and CP in 44 patients with OC that had recurred

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call