Abstract
Objective To demonstrate the feasibility, effectiveness and reliability of combination of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and excision-closed hemorrhoidectomy (ECH) for severe hemorrhoids. Methods Sixty patients with Ⅲ- Ⅳ degree hemorrhoids which left remnant prolapsed hemorrhoids after stapled hemorrhoidopexy, were randomly divided into group A (PPH with additional ECH group,30 cases.) and group B [PPH with additional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) group, 30 cases]. Ten indexes of the results in two groups were compared. Results The hemorrhoidectomy lasted (35.6 ± 5.3) min in group A and (47.3 ± 10.2) min in group B. The indexes related to 24 h visual analogue scale (VAS) after operation were (2.9 ± 1.2) scores in group A and (5.7 ± 1.9) scores in group B. Wound healing time were (6.3 ± 1.4) d in group A and (28.5 ± 4.8) d in group B. Many indexes showed the results in group A was better than those in group B ( P ＜ 0.05 ). The six-month follow-up visits after operation showed no complications, such as recurrence in either group. Conclusions Combination treatment for Ⅲ -Ⅳ degree hemorrhoids with PPH with additional ECH is a easy,safe,reliable,minimal-aching and quick-recovering method of hemorrhoidectomy with favorable results than PPH with additional MMH. Key words: Hemorrhoids; Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids; Excision-closed hemorrhoidectomy; Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
