Clinical significance of the growth hormone response to vasoactive intestinal peptide and gonadotropin-releasing hormone in acromegaly

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

GH-secreting pituitary adenomas causing acromegaly can be classified into at least two types, i.e. the lactotroph-like adenoma and somatotroph-like adenoma. From a functional point of view, the lactotroph-like adenoma is characterized by positive GH responses to TRH and bromocriptine (Br) with a GH increase or decrease, respectively, whereas the somatotroph-like adenoma is characterized by a high GH response to GHRH and a low GH response to TRH and Br. In this study, we examined whether the loading of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and GnRH, another hypothalamic hormone capable of stimulating GH secretion in acromegaly, have a pathophysiological significance as TRH, GHRH, and Br tests. In 52 patients with active acromegaly, we performed iv bolus injections of TRH (500 μg), GHRH (100 μg), VIP (100 μg), and GnRH (100 μg), and a peroral administration of Br (2.5 mg), in order to compare the GH responses to these loads. There was a significant correlation that the higher was the GH response after TRH the greater was the GH decrease after Br. Although statistically insignificant, there was a trend (0.05 < p < 0.1) that the higher was the GH response after GHRH the smaller was the GH decrease after Br. In addition, as novel findings, we observed that the GH responses to GHRH, VIP, and GnRH were in significant positive correlations to each other, and that the higher were the GH responses after VIP and GnRH the smaller was the GH decrease after Br. In agreement with this, we also found that a simultaneous GH responsivity to VIP and/or GnRH in TRH-responsive acromegalics significantly enhanced the GH response to GHRH and lowered the Br responsiveness compared to the data of pure TRH-responders. From these results, we hypothesize that the positive GH responsiveness to VIP and GnRH, like that to GHRH, may be a feature of the somatotroph-like pituitary adenoma causing acromegaly. The present results appear to be of some help in understanding the basis of the great variabilities in the GH responses to various dynamic testings in acromegaly.