Abstract
Background Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a rare neurodegenerative disease with diverse clinical phenotypes, prompting the development of new diagnostic criteria known as the MDS-PSP classification. However, little is known about the prognostic value of this classification in order to better stratify patients for the clinical trials. Objective To assess the impact of the different clinical phenotypes according to the MDS-PSP classification on prognosis using the clinical milestones of death, severe dysphagia, institutionalization, and need for walking aid. Methods A prospective cohort of 205 PSP patients from Lille University Hospital was analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified into different MSD-PSP phenotypes according to their clinical presentation after 3 years of follow-up. The milestones of death, severe dysphagia, institutionalization, and need for walking aid were recorded, and a survival analysis was performed to describe the prognosis of each disease presentation. Results Median survival time was 6.4 (interquartile range (IQR): 4.8–8.6) years and mean diagnostic delay from symptom onset was 38.1 ± 22.5 months. PSP Richardson Syndrome (PSP-RS) had a poorer survival rate and a higher occurrence of severe dysphagia and need for walking aid compared to PSP variants such as PSP Parkinsonism (PSP-P), PSP postural instability without ocular motor dysfunction (PSP-PI), and other rare phenotypes. Conclusions PSP-RS has a less favorable prognosis compared to PSP variants stratified according to the MDS-PSP classification. This classification could assist in selecting patients for clinical trials and help design outcomes that account for the disease heterogeneity.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.