Abstract

Introduction and Objectives: Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a common cause of cancer treatment withdrawal, related to the poor outcomes. The cardiac-specific treatment could recover the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We analyzed the clinical profile and prognosis of patients with CTRCD in a real-world scenario.Methods: A retrospective study that include all the cancer patients diagnosed with CTRCD, defined as LVEF < 50%. We analyzed the cardiac and oncologic treatments, the predictors of mortality and LVEF recovery, hospital admission, and the causes of mortality (cardiovascular (CV), non-CV, and cancer-related).Results: We included 113 patients (82.3% women, age 49.2 ± 12.1 years). Breast cancer (72.6%) and anthracyclines (72.6%) were the most frequent cancer and treatment. Meantime to CTRCD was 8 months, with mean LVEF of 39.4 ± 9.2%. At diagnosis, 27.4% of the patients were asymptomatic. Cardiac-specific treatment was started in 66.4% of patients, with LVEF recovery-rate of 54.8%. Higher LVEF at the time of CTRCD, shorter time from cancer treatment to diagnosis of CTRCD, and younger age were the predictors of LVEF recovery. The hospitalization rate was 20.4% (8.8% linked to heart failure). Treatment with trastuzumab and lower LVEF at diagnosis of CTRCD were the predictors of mortality. Thirty point nine percent of patients died during the 26 months follow-up. The non-CV causes and cancer-related were more frequent than CV ones.Conclusions: Cardiac-specific treatment achieves LVEF recovery in more than half of the patients. LVEF at the diagnosis of CTRCD, age, and time from the cancer treatment initiation to CTRCD were the predictors of LVEF recovery. The CV-related deaths were less frequent than the non-CV ones. Trastuzumab treatment and LVEF at the time of CTRCD were the predictors of mortality.

Highlights

  • Introduction and ObjectivesCancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a common cause of cancer treatment withdrawal, related to the poor outcomes

  • In the binary logistic regression analysis (Table 5), higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the time of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) [OR 1.13; CI 95% 1.03–1.25; p = 0.008], shorter time from starting chemotherapy to the diagnosis of CTRCD [OR 0.99; CI 95% 0.98–1.00; p = 0.023], and younger age [OR 0.94; CI 95% 0.88–0.99; p = 0.03] were identified as the predictors of LVEF recovery, independently of trastuzumab treatment, heart failure (HF) admission at diagnosis of CTRCD, and Carvedilol treatment after dysfunction

  • The main findings of our study were: [1] with appropriate cardiac treatment in 66% of all patients, up to 55% of patients achieve LVEF recovery; [2] early CTRCD diagnosis is associated with improved LVEF recovery after initiation of cardiac-specific treatment; [3] less advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) at the time of CTRCD diagnosis is associated with the Predictors of LVEF recovery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a common cause of cancer treatment withdrawal, related to the poor outcomes. The cardiac-specific treatment could recover the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a structural or functional myocardial injury secondary to cancer treatment. In a recently published multicenter registry, the incidence of cardiotoxicity, defined as a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 50%, elevated cardiac biomarkers, or presence of other abnormal echo parameters, such as a significant decrease in the global longitudinal strain (GLS), reached 37.5%. The advanced stages of CTRCD imply left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), with different ranges of ejection fraction impairment [2]. There is a lack of clinical trial-based evidence on the specific management of patients with LVSD secondary to the cancer treatment, and they are treated to the rest of patients with LVSD [3]. Sacubitril-valsartan showed a potential benefit in cardiac remodeling in oncological patients [4, 5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call