Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the reliability of a combined strategy of clinical assessment score followed by a local D-dimer test to exclude deep vein thrombosis. For comparison D-dimer was analysed post hoc and batchwise at a coagulation laboratory. Design: Prospective multicenter management study. Setting: Seven hospitals in southern Sweden. Subjects: 357 patients with a suspected first episode of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were prospectively recruited and pre-test probability score (Wells score) was estimated by the emergency physician. If categorized as low pre-test probability, D-dimer was analysed and if negative, DVTwas considered to be ruled out. The primary outcome was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 3 months of follow up. Results: Prevalence of DVT was 23.5% (84/357). A low pre-test probability and a negative D-dimer result at inclusion was found in 31% (110/357) of the patients of whom one (0.9%, [95% CI 0.02—4.96]) had a VTE at follow up. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and negative likelihood ratio for our local D-dimer test in the low probability group were 85.7%, 74.5%, 98.2%, and 0,19 respectively compared to 85.6%, 67,6%, 97.9% and 0,23 using batchwise analysis at a coagulation laboratory. Conclusion: Pre-test probability score and D-dimer safely rule out DVT in about 30% of
Paper version not known (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have