Abstract

Objective:According to the characteristics of endoscopic transnasal and transoral surgery for infratemporal fossa tumors, we divided and named subzones of the infratemporal fossa, to explore the approaches of endoscopic transnasal and transoral surgery for infratemporal fossa tumors, and to analyze their advantages and disadvantages. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 36 patients with benign tumors of infratemporal fossa successfully resected through nose or mouth under endoscope, summarized and analyzed the localization characteristics of these tumors in infratemporal fossa, and made a subzone naming rule of infratemporal fossa. We also summarized the selection principles, advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic transnasal and transoral surgical approaches. Results:The infratemporal fossa area is divided into ABC area. Area A is the fat pad area posterolateral of maxillary sinus. Area B is further divided into B1 (above the plane of maxillary sinus floor, anterior styloid process), B2 (below the plane of maxillary sinus floor, anterior styloid process), and B3 (posterior styloid process to anterior vertebra); Area C is retropharyngeal and eustachian tube area. The location of the tumor in the infratemporal fossa determines the choice of transnasal and transoral approaches. All tumors were completely removed, and no tumor recurred during the follow-up. A few patients had temporary local sensory function decline, and recovered during the follow-up. Conclusion:The infratemporal fossa region naming rule according to the characteristics of endoscopic transoral and transnasal surgery approach is simple and practical, which can effectively guide the operation of the infratemporal fossa region and has clinical application value.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call