Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve-In-Valve and Valve-In-Ring Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) or valve-in-ring (VIR) therapies for degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valves and rings are still evolving. We aimed to characterize short- and long-term outcomes of these procedures. An electronic literature search was conducted to retrieve articles describing mitral VIV or VIR implantation with at least 10 patients. Meta-analysis of proportions was carried out for 30-day or in-hospital outcomes of mortality, stroke, major bleeding, transfusion, acute kidney injury, procedural success, valve embolization, paravalvular leak, pacemaker implantation, and hospital stay. Individual patient data meta-analysis using Kaplan-Meier curve reconstruction was used to estimate long-term mortality of VIV, VIR and redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). We analyzed 34 studies (7047 patients). Pooled procedural success was 94.8% in VIV and 80.5% in VIR. Pooled short-term mortality and stroke risk was 6.4% and 1.9% respectively in VIV, 9.1% and 1.6% respectively in VIR, and 8.4% and 5.5% respectively in SMVR. This study provides prognostic information on clinical outcomes for redo SMVR and transcatheter mitral VIV and VIR implantation.