Clinical evaluation of peripheral tissue perfusion as a predictor of mortality in sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine the diagnostic performance of the clinical evaluation of peripheral tissue perfusion in the prediction of mortality. DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis. SettingIntensive care unit. Patients and participantsPatients with sepsis and septic shock. InterventionsStudies of patients with sepsis and/or septic shock that associated clinical monitoring of tissue perfusion with mortality were included. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and OVID databases. Main variables of interestThe risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the predictive accuracy for mortality. Review Manager software version 5.4 was used to draw the forest plot graphs, and Stata version 15.1 was used to build the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. ResultsThirteen studies were included, with a total of 1667 patients and 17 analyses. Two articles evaluated the temperature gradient, four evaluated the capillary refill time, and seven evaluated the mottling in the skin. In most studies, the outcome was mortality at 14 or 28 days. The pooled sensitivity of the included studies was 70%, specificity 75.9% (95% CI, 61.6%–86.2%), diagnostic odds ratio 7.41 (95% CI, 3.91–14.04), and positive and negative likelihood ratios 2.91 (95% CI, 1.80–4.72) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.30–0.51), respectively. ConclusionsClinical evaluation of tissue perfusion at the bedside is a useful tool, with moderate sensitivity and specificity, to identify patients with a higher risk of death among those with sepsis and septic shock. RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42019134351.